Tony Thomas

Father to two, husband to one, web developer and musician.


Archive for April, 2008


Go Mobile Young Man!

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008

I’ve previously commented that mobile technology is the next frontier in the technology sphere. It seems that Mike Arrington at TechCrunch agrees. Look for the next tech boom to be in mobile technology. It’s going to connect us in ways we never dreamed possible.

In the mid nineties when what we know as the web was overtaking the Gopher procotol and computers were entering homes and lifestyles everywhere, there was some talk about the dehumanizing effect of the personal computer. Baby Boomers were worried that the kids would spend too much time isolated in front of the computer screen. That notion seems so quaint now.

Comcast using Twitter to Respond to Consumer Complaints

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

I don’t think it’s any secret that Comcast has an image problem. I have to give them some credit for trolling Twitter (or more likely going a Tweetscan), and responding directly to consumer complaints with e-mails and phone calls from the executive’s offices.

Do you see the value now?

Radiohead’s Chicken & Egg Marketing Conundrum

Monday, April 7th, 2008

Radiohead does it again. By now you’ve probably heard that Radiohead is offering the raw tracks of their “Nude” single for remixing. A few years ago this sort of thing would not have been possible, but with advent of GarageBand and other free and low-cost digital audio suites, thousands of people can participate and engage with Radiohead’s music in a new and exciting way. I haven’t purchased the tracks yet, but I’m about one visit to the iTunes Music Store away from doing it.

Radiohead has been able to position themselves at the forefront of this new model of distribution. So far it’s been very successful for them, but can other artists leverage this same concept as successfully? Probably not. Radiohead has a huge and extremely devoted fanbase already in place. It’s arguable that anything they do is going to be successful.

Still, I think the concept is still new enough that independent artists can use the same idea to connect with their fans. I used to be in an indie band called Anchorhead. In 2001 and 2003 we gave both our CDs away on our website for free before either one was released. Our fans and friends were familiar with our songs before the CDs came out and would often sing a long in the crowd. They also bought other merchandise, such as t-shirts and posters. We didn’t get rich, but we weren’t setting out to do so. A more serious band could replay that scenario in cities around the country. There’s still a lot of work to be done for independent recording artists to gain a following, but with the right combination of good music and new distribution models, there is a myriad of ways to establish ongoing communication, feedback and personal connections with fans. Radiohead brings that to popular culture. Indie bands can bring it to their friends.

Will Twitter Get Benched?

Friday, April 4th, 2008

The Industry Standard put Twitter on it’s “predicted to fail” list.

Failings: There’s no compelling reason for most people to use it, and many existing services — ranging from AIM to FriendFeed to social networks — have overlapping functionality. And how is it supposed to make money?

That’s the $10,000 question isn’t it? (Pun intended.) Where’s the money in it?

When I was a senior in high school (in 1988), a teacher once told me that in the near future information would be the key factor in success and power. It sounded good, but I didn’t quite get what he was talking about at the time. Now look at us. Google is the case and point for what he was talking about.

The information contained in Twitter is not as voluminous as what Google has to offer, but it’s immediate. I know within seconds if someone is tweeting about something I’m tracking on Twitter. Seconds. It doesn’t take a lot of imagination to figure out a potential use for that information. And the last I checked, Twitter was still the most popular of the micromedia sites out there. I think it could go somewhere. You?

Amazon.com Announces TextBuyIt

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Cell phones are quickly becoming the new frontier in emerging technology. I’m told that smart phone adoption rates are much higher in Japan and Europe. Here in the U.S., things are just heating up. Yesterday Amazon.com announced TextBuyIt, a service that will allow you to compare prices by sending a text message. Amazon sends a message in return with pricing info on the product in question w/ an option to buy from them on the spot.

Amazon TextBuyIt, which launched late Tuesday, lets people text the name of a product, its description or its UPC or ISBN to 262966 (that’s “Amazon” on the keypad) from anywhere their cell phones work – including from inside physical stores.

If Amazon stocks matching items, the service returns two results at a time. Shoppers can immediately buy one of the first two the selections by texting back the number “1″ or “2,” or they can ask for more by texting the letter “M.”

Paypal announced a similar service last year. Paypal offers more possibilities for independent retailers whereas Amazon’s service is a direct challenge to big box retailers. The only thing the two have in common is leveraging mobile phone technology. Therein lies the key. Terms like Web 3.0 will quickly become obsolete as mobile technology continues to emerge. What we’re going to see is a combination of traditional internet technology combined with mobile technology. What we consider “Web” is quickly moving beyond fiber optics and phone lines and is combining with wireless internet and cellular. Phones are cheap in comparison to computers. Their mobility makes communication even more instantaneous in an era where a story is old seconds after it first appears.

I never fully realized the appeal of this instantaneous communication until this year’s SXSW Interactive conference. I was following someone from Minnesota who was there and witnessed the takeover of a panel that was facilitated by backchannels created in Twitter and Meebo. I didn’t get a detailed account, but sitting in my office in Minneapolis, I was privy to something very interesting occurring in Austin, TX. I’ll be very surprised if I don’t read about it in Wired next month.

Last month I saw Matt Dickman speak and in part of his presentation, he covered the timing of information released about the 35W bridge collapse. It turns out that word got out via Twitter before traditional media had a chance to start reporting on it.

Two days ago, @chuckumentary reported on an oil spill via Twitter as it happened. The whole phenomenon has exciting implications for consumers, marketers, citizen journalists and friends. The connections no longer require us to be tethered to a computer. If you haven’t tried it, you have no idea how appealing that is.

Upgraded to WordPress 2.5

Wednesday, April 2nd, 2008

WordPress 1.x was the first CMS to get me to move away from my old home-brewed CMS I used to use for blogging. Yesterday I upgraded this blog to Worpress 2.5. Even though you can’t see it, the admin area has a whole new look and support for audio and video in posts. I’m going to upgrade Minneapoliscast next to see how well it works with a podcast. Then a handful of other sites including the site I maintain for work.

This is my first post with the new interface. It’s taking a little getting used to, but once I figure out where everything is I think I’ll like it. I can’t say I can give WordPress a fair review in comparison to other CMS’s since I’ve never used Movable Type, Joomla, Drupal or any other of a cornucopia of blogging applications and content management systems.

Anyone else have experience with these others? How do they compare?

Anger Content Management

Tuesday, April 1st, 2008

Last Friday James Lileks published a column in the Star Tribune called “Godless Death or Sensible Joy Spirals.” I realize that this is meant to be a humorous piece, but it got me thinking: What is the purpose of publishing such innocuous content in the newspaper? I mean, why waste the column inches?

Then I thought about my reaction to the piece, which, at least initially, was anger. Admittedly this is probably not the response the piece is meant to evoke. It’s just my zealous environmentalism getting the best of me. But it worked. The article hooked me and I was drawn, not only to read the whole thing, but to look it up on their website for this post.

I can only conclude then, that this was a very successful column. I bet by the time this posts, there will be some responses in the editorial pages. Maybe that’s the point. Maybe articles like this are meant to engage us in a dialog–no matter how silly. No reaction to a newspaper article is a bad reaction. Any reaction at all is good as long as the reader is engaged in some way. After all, publishing papers is all about delivering readers to advertisers.