Archive for the ‘Google’ Category


Google’s AppEngine

Thursday, April 10th, 2008

Last week Google announced it’s AppEngine. It took a couple of days and a conversation with a friend to realize some of the potential for this service.

Google’s AppEngine service is a framework for developing web-based applications. Google provides free hosting for anything built with it. Right now Python is the only supported language, but Ruby and PHP are on the horizon.

What if someone built a new music distribution application using Google’s AppEngine? A savvy developer could create an easy-to-use application for bands to create sites with the means to upload, share or sell mp3 downloads (or FLAC or whatever). Tie it in with Google’s Checkout service and you’ve got a winner.

How long before someone develops a social networking application that makes Facebook mute using Google’s AppEngine and social networking framework? Or tie in to Google’s mobile technology? Say what you will about Google holding the keys. They certainly exhibit vision. Big as they are, I think this is only the beginning. Dark fiber anyone?

Will Apple & Google One Day Be Perceived Like Microsoft Is Now?

Monday, March 31st, 2008

Columnist Don Reisinger at ITworld.com posits that we will one day look with disdain at current good guys Apple and Google. Reisinger’s argument goes like this: Apple and Google are perceived as “good guys” right now. Microsoft, now perceived as an “evil empire” was once perceived as the good guy. Therefore Apple and Google will soon be evil empires themselves as they increase their market share because consumers are fickle.

It’s not hard to shoot holes in this argument. The two main issues I see are:

  • different business practices
  • better PR

Apple is the absolute king of controlling the message. They are the purveyors of cool. I kid you not, the design on Apple computers trickles all the way down to brooms. If you work in the IT field, you may be frustrated that they’re not letting you develop applications for the iPhone. You may be mad that you can’t buy their OS to use on anyone else’s hardware. But those are strictly IT biases and not necessarily bad business practices.

Apple is all about controlling the experience. They want to assure that OS X looks good when you use it, so they make you buy their hardware. They want to make sure the iPod works exactly as expected. So they lock you into their software. Paternalistic? Sure. But it works and it works for millions of consumers. That’s what matters. The experience is the same for everyone and it’s simple and elegant. I don’t see that changing, and I don’t see consumers clamoring for it to change. At least not many consumers.

What about Google? Google shows the most promise for overshadowing Microsoft in terms of size and power. I know Google and they are no Microsoft. For one thing, Google has adopted completely different and more open business practices. Have you looked at the number of applications and APIs available through Google right now? I can’t keep up. Licensing fees? What licensing fees? Want to use Google Earth? Free. Google maps? Free. Unlimited email? Free. Word processor? Um, yeah that’s free too. What do we have to do in exchange? Put up with some advertising. TV, radio & newspapers have proved that model works. I’ve been ignoring ads my whole life. Why do I put up with it? Because I get something I want in exchange.

Plus, I think Google has done a pretty good job of controlling how it’s perceived. They respond to criticism immediately in their multitude of blogs. (How many Google corporate blogs are there anyway?) It’s about controlling the message, something Microsoft has never seemed to do well.

I’m not even going to go into a listing of Microsoft’s questionable business practices or my opinions on the quality of their products. This, it seems to me, is a question of perception. Apple and Google will not be Evil Empires 2.0. At least, I don’t think they will.