Upgraded to Wordpress 2.5

Wordpress 1.x was the first CMS to get me to move away from my old home-brewed CMS I used to use for blogging. Yesterday I upgraded this blog to Worpress 2.5. Even though you can’t see it, the admin area has a whole new look and support for audio and video in posts. I’m going to upgrade Minneapoliscast next to see how well it works with a podcast. Then a handful of other sites including the site I maintain for work.

This is my first post with the new interface. It’s taking a little getting used to, but once I figure out where everything is I think I’ll like it. I can’t say I can give Wordpress a fair review in comparison to other CMS’s since I’ve never used Movable Type, Joomla, Drupal or any other of a cornucopia of blogging applications and content management systems.

Anyone else have experience with these others? How do they compare?

Anger Content Management

Last Friday James Lileks published a column in the Star Tribune called “Godless Death or Sensible Joy Spirals.” I realize that this is meant to be a humorous piece, but it got me thinking: What is the purpose of publishing such innocuous content in the newspaper? I mean, why waste the column inches?

Then I thought about my reaction to the piece, which, at least initially, was anger. Admittedly this is probably not the response the piece is meant to evoke. It’s just my zealous environmentalism getting the best of me. But it worked. The article hooked me and I was drawn, not only to read the whole thing, but to look it up on their website for this post.

I can only conclude then, that this was a very successful column. I bet by the time this posts, there will be some responses in the editorial pages. Maybe that’s the point. Maybe articles like this are meant to engage us in a dialog–no matter how silly. No reaction to a newspaper article is a bad reaction. Any reaction at all is good as long as the reader is engaged in some way. After all, publishing papers is all about delivering readers to advertisers.

Will Apple & Google One Day Be Perceived Like Microsoft Is Now?

Columnist Don Reisinger at ITworld.com posits that we will one day look with disdain at current good guys Apple and Google. Reisinger’s argument goes like this: Apple and Google are perceived as “good guys” right now. Microsoft, now perceived as an “evil empire” was once perceived as the good guy. Therefore Apple and Google will soon be evil empires themselves as they increase their market share because consumers are fickle.

It’s not hard to shoot holes in this argument. The two main issues I see are:

  • different business practices
  • better PR

Apple is the absolute king of controlling the message. They are the purveyors of cool. I kid you not, the design on Apple computers trickles all the way down to brooms. If you work in the IT field, you may be frustrated that they’re not letting you develop applications for the iPhone. You may be mad that you can’t buy their OS to use on anyone else’s hardware. But those are strictly IT biases and not necessarily bad business practices.

Apple is all about controlling the experience. They want to assure that OS X looks good when you use it, so they make you buy their hardware. They want to make sure the iPod works exactly as expected. So they lock you into their software. Paternalistic? Sure. But it works and it works for millions of consumers. That’s what matters. The experience is the same for everyone and it’s simple and elegant. I don’t see that changing, and I don’t see consumers clamoring for it to change. At least not many consumers.

What about Google? Google shows the most promise for overshadowing Microsoft in terms of size and power. I know Google and they are no Microsoft. For one thing, Google has adopted completely different and more open business practices. Have you looked at the number of applications and APIs available through Google right now? I can’t keep up. Licensing fees? What licensing fees? Want to use Google Earth? Free. Google maps? Free. Unlimited email? Free. Word processor? Um, yeah that’s free too. What do we have to do in exchange? Put up with some advertising. TV, radio & newspapers have proved that model works. I’ve been ignoring ads my whole life. Why do I put up with it? Because I get something I want in exchange.

Plus, I think Google has done a pretty good job of controlling how it’s perceived. They respond to criticism immediately in their multitude of blogs. (How many Google corporate blogs are there anyway?) It’s about controlling the message, something Microsoft has never seemed to do well.

I’m not even going to go into a listing of Microsoft’s questionable business practices or my opinions on the quality of their products. This, it seems to me, is a question of perception. Apple and Google will not be Evil Empires 2.0. At least, I don’t think they will.

Using Social Networking Sites for Research

Is there anyone out there who is leveraging social networking technology for research? It seems like there’s a lot of research out there on it, but who’s taking advantage of it? With a little imagination, it doesn’t seem hard to find some uses. Let’s start with an easy one: Twitter.

Where I work, we’re doing a study where we monitor a group of participants for 4 years. They come to the clinic every 4 weeks to have their blood drawn and fill out a survey. We also monitor their symptoms. It’s a study on mononucleosis. None of these participants have been exposed yet. We’re waiting to see when they are exposed. We want to see how sick they get and what the risk factors are.

Now every 2 weeks I send them a reminder to log in to our website and report any symptoms they may be having at the time. (It’s a simple little homebrewed application I developed. Thank you very much.) The process is fairly painless and once you’ve done it once, you can generally complete it in under a minute.

What if we used Twitter (or a Twitter-like tool) to do the same thing? Study participants follow a department profile. Once every two weeks a tweet goes out that says, “Have a sore throat? Fatigue? Swollen or Tender glands? Reply ‘d @truetone yes’”. We’d reach participants wherever they are instantly. No waiting until they are tethered to a computer.

In this case, the immediacy is not all that necessary. But I’m sure there is research out there where it could be beneficial. Doing marketing research? What better way to instantaneously compile data? What better way to instantaneously disseminate data? See where I’m headed?

There’s a lot of talk in marketing about engaging consumers. What if we frame research in marketing terms? I know of at least one department at The Big U that already does mass mailings. Let’s bring that into the 21st century. I’m just saying, with a little imagination, we can take advantage of some really fun, cutting edge technology. It may be more than just novel. It may be important.

I Was There

On a geological scale, I’m just a nanosecond. Smaller probably. By internet standards, I guess I’m an old man. For a while I was worried that I’d missed the boat. You know, came along too late. But as I look back, I’ve been on the internet for 14 years. Ever since I installed a Gopher client on my first 386 running Windows 3.0. I was there when Mosaic was a breakthrough for browsing the web–quickly replaced by Netscape.

Sure, I didn’t jump into website development right away, but by 1999 I was working on websites. If anyone remembers the first iteration of mp3.com, they got social networking back in 1998. I was in a band at the time and bands could link to “friends”. How colloquial that all seems.

By 2003, I’d built my own PHP-based blog CMS. By 2005 I was podcasting. In 2007 I got hooked on Twitter.

What’s next? There are a lot of folks out there trying to be the next big thing. Personally, I find it all quite inspiring. I think in the next few years, some standards will emerge and all of these tools will be available to us.

Imagine using Twitter for research. All your followers get an update from you and they simply report on back with a direct message “d @truetone I’m doing this.” Blam! Instant feedback. Somehow that just seems incredibly exciting to me.

So I used to worry that I’d waited too long. No more. This is only the beginning. It’s only going to get better.

Be Careful With Your Betas

Last week, I went on a total spree signing up for sites in beta. A lot of new social media sites and other sites I thought might be cool or useful. Then I went to openpeople.us and signed up. (I’m not linking to them, because I don’t want anyone who may read this to actually sign up. Do so at your own risk.) It seemed like just another social networking site. It had the typical “friend finder” application that lets you enter your Gmail account info to see if any of your contacts have accounts at the site. But instead of allowing me to opt in to invite my friends, the application just sent a message to every…single…contact I have inviting them to the site and signed the e-mail as if it came from me.

Today it sent another message to all of those who had the nerve to ignore the original request. I can only guess that it will probably do so at least one more time before the invite “expires”. I logged in today and could find no way to stop it or delete the invitations.

Sorry to all my friends who I’ve inadvertently spammed. That was not my intent. I’m going to be much more careful where I point my betas from now on. Lesson learned.

Hello world!

I’m leaving the title. I’ve actually been blogging since 2002. This year my old blog was lost in what I can only call the great server crash of aught-eight. So here I am with a shiny new URL named after me. Anthony G. Thomas. You can call me Tony.

Hello World!